Pada 16 April 2009, adalah tarikh dimana teman telah putuskan hari dimana Melayu mesti bersatu. Tanggal 16 April adalah hari 1Melayu.
Kenapa teman kata begini. Teman sempat bersembang dengan seorang anak muda dalam bidang IT. Beliau sangat risau kerana kemungkinan Melayu akan hilang kuasa. UMNO dipinggirkan; PAS dan Melayu PKR akan di kudakan.
Teman sarankan Melayu harus bersatu. Melayu dalam PAS dan UMNO bersama kaum Bumiputera boleh memerintah walaupun dalam tanpa 2/3 majoriti. Kenapa dahulu Melayu mesti bergabung kuasa pada zaman pra 2008? Ini kerana Melayu berfikiran yang Melayu/Bumiputera tidak memmpunyai kemahiran memerintah negara.
Kalau kita teliti, apakah sekarang Melayu atau Bumiputera tidak mempunyai kemahiran dalam banyak bidang seperti ekonomi, sains, IT dan kedoktoran. Teman fikir sudah sampai masa 1Melayu berfikiran positif. 1Melayu boleh perintah Malaysia tanpa kaum China dan India.
Apa perlu UMNO buat? Keluar dari BN adalah 1pilihan .
Selepas analisa Bukit Gantang dan Bukit Selambau, kita sudah pasti bahawa 68% Melayu undi UMNO dan kemenangan PAS di bukit gantang adalah isyarat dan mandat kaum Bukan Melayu kepada Nizar untuk terus menderhaka terhadap Raja Melayu.
Sudah jelas UMNO tidak lagi mandapat mandat kaum China dan India. Tidak ada gunanya UMNO menjadi batu penghalang hukum Hudud lagi. UMNO harus kini mendokong Hudud dalam sistem syariah yang sedia ada. Kes Tutup.
UMNO mesti nampak bersih dan bergabung kuasa untuk perintah Malaysia.
Hidup 1Melayu Hidup 1Bumiputera.
Kisah-kisah dan teropongan seorang siamang profesional di Bukit Antarabangsa, Ampang, Selangor. Bukit Antarabangsa adalah kawasan berbukit ramai golongan artis dan professional tinggal. Blog ini kini mesra waktu pejabat. Sifat siamang adalah untuk melolong apa berita yang baik dan buruk di terima. Klik control play untuk mendengar lolongannya.
Bebel Without a Clause
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
DSAI umumkan seorang bukan Melayu mengganti Fairuz Mantan Timbalan Ketua Menteri P Pinang
Tidak hairan sekiranya DSAI atau brother Anwar Bin Ibrahim, akan mengumumkan seorang yang bukan bangsa Melayu sebagai pengganti kepada Fairuz yang telah meletak jawatan. Ini adalah taktik BABI kerana mahu menunjukan yang beliau berjiwa rakyat...
Tunggu......
Tunggu......
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Setelah berpolitik di masjid, Nizar kini di tuduh pencuri
Teman amat sedih bila dengar Nizar menjadikan masjid sebagai tempat perpecahan bukan sebagai tapak perpaduan bila mana teman diberitahu beliau telah di beri jalan oleh Imam untuk berucap dan ada juga mengatakan menjadi imam disebuah masjid di Bukit Gantang. tak patut lah Nizar berbuat demikian walau di beri jalan sedemikian memandangkan penyokong BN pun ada di sana. Nizar sepatutnya secara gentleman menolak pelawaan tersebut dengan alasan bahawa tidak molek buat begitu memandangkan dia sedang bertanding. Si imam harus yang membenarkan Nizar berucap harus di pecat untuk memelihara persaudaraan orang Islam di masjid itu. Kita malu bahawa kalau kita tidak dapat bersatu dibawah satu bumbung masjid macamana kita hendak bersatu dibawah satu negara wlahal kita tahu kini umat Islam tidak mengikut aliran keluarga. Satu keluarga ada yang PAS, PKR atau UMNO. Kita mesti mempunyai satu etika antara Melayu atau orang Islam agar kita sentiasa ada tempat untuk bersatu walaupunkita bercakar.
UMNO tidak anti PAS kerana itu bermakna bencikan saudara kita sendiri.
Kita tidak sukakan Nizar dalam rakusannya, dia telah menjadi tunggang Ngeh dan Ngah. Ibarat menang sorak kampung tergadai.
Kita dengar cara rhetorik kononnya beliau sentiasa membacakan Quran dalam mesyuarat. Soalannya masih sampai sekarang tiada dengar desas desus Ngeh Ngah masuk Islam.
Ngeh tesengih Ngah ternganga mendengar Nizar membaca. Apa mereka duli, janji mereka ini dapat 'main belakang' Nizar dan orang Melayu.
Kini Nizar digelar pencuri. Kalau ikut Islam menggunakan harta rakyat tanpa izin itu mencuri namanya.
Dulu Teman tidak kisah kalau sesiapa. PAS ke UMNO menang. Janji orang Melayu dan Islam. Dan kita dapat duduk bersama bermusyawarah bersama untuk kebaikan orang Islam. Tapi Nizar tidak membawa imej PAS sebagai Parti Islam.
Bukit Gantang harus memberi mesej keapda Nizar, bahawa tiada tempat si penderhaka dan mereka yang menghina masjid.
UMNO tidak anti PAS kerana itu bermakna bencikan saudara kita sendiri.
Kita tidak sukakan Nizar dalam rakusannya, dia telah menjadi tunggang Ngeh dan Ngah. Ibarat menang sorak kampung tergadai.
Kita dengar cara rhetorik kononnya beliau sentiasa membacakan Quran dalam mesyuarat. Soalannya masih sampai sekarang tiada dengar desas desus Ngeh Ngah masuk Islam.
Ngeh tesengih Ngah ternganga mendengar Nizar membaca. Apa mereka duli, janji mereka ini dapat 'main belakang' Nizar dan orang Melayu.
Kini Nizar digelar pencuri. Kalau ikut Islam menggunakan harta rakyat tanpa izin itu mencuri namanya.
Dulu Teman tidak kisah kalau sesiapa. PAS ke UMNO menang. Janji orang Melayu dan Islam. Dan kita dapat duduk bersama bermusyawarah bersama untuk kebaikan orang Islam. Tapi Nizar tidak membawa imej PAS sebagai Parti Islam.
Bukit Gantang harus memberi mesej keapda Nizar, bahawa tiada tempat si penderhaka dan mereka yang menghina masjid.
Friday, March 20, 2009
Apakah kita perlu merasa sedih bila PM menjadi mantan PM?
Jawapannya tidak.
This man has singlehandedly almost destroyed UMNO for what they had built for 52 years in less than 2 terms.
Damn for those people who think otherwise.
Rationale?
If you look at the results he won in 2004, it was then among the best in many elections and he had overturned that results before the next term. That means for every year of the service he had destroyed 10 years of good reputation of BN and UMNO.
So this man has in fact has regressed UMNO into the twilight zone of politics.
And ironically, he has many days to go and yet he still manage to leave a trademark of his governance of fiasco.
The recently Limbang and UMNO Disciplinary not banning KJ for example, will need a strong and capable leader to lead UMNO for immediate resolution through the next elections.
We lost all the credibility that is left, and the Disciplinary Commitee should have delved deeper into the perception of the people, now that Norza is also allowed to contest.
In the future, in the application form, please ensure a clause is added that every aspiring candidate shall be not allowed to contest if he or she is charged in court and authorities due to money politics.
Abdullah Badawi is a liablity, and I am glad that he is gone. Breath UMNO,breath.
I say this piece of my mind because I love UMNO and the Malays more than anything else.
Damn for saying it and Damned for not saying it.
----Blax Monkey ------
This man has singlehandedly almost destroyed UMNO for what they had built for 52 years in less than 2 terms.
Damn for those people who think otherwise.
Rationale?
If you look at the results he won in 2004, it was then among the best in many elections and he had overturned that results before the next term. That means for every year of the service he had destroyed 10 years of good reputation of BN and UMNO.
So this man has in fact has regressed UMNO into the twilight zone of politics.
And ironically, he has many days to go and yet he still manage to leave a trademark of his governance of fiasco.
The recently Limbang and UMNO Disciplinary not banning KJ for example, will need a strong and capable leader to lead UMNO for immediate resolution through the next elections.
We lost all the credibility that is left, and the Disciplinary Commitee should have delved deeper into the perception of the people, now that Norza is also allowed to contest.
In the future, in the application form, please ensure a clause is added that every aspiring candidate shall be not allowed to contest if he or she is charged in court and authorities due to money politics.
Abdullah Badawi is a liablity, and I am glad that he is gone. Breath UMNO,breath.
I say this piece of my mind because I love UMNO and the Malays more than anything else.
Damn for saying it and Damned for not saying it.
----Blax Monkey ------
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Why we should not trust lawyers. The Proof Part 2
Follwo up to my previous posting:
-------------------------------
The following quotations are from a book called Disorder in the American Courts by Charles M. Sevilla and are things people actually said in court, word for word, taken down and published by court reporters that had the torment of staying calm while these exchanges were taking place. Regardless of originations, they can be eye openers as to the mentality of those engaged in the drill...
ATTORNEY: What was the first thing your husband said to you that morning?
WITNESS: He said, 'Where am I, Cathy?'
ATTORNEY: And why did that upset you?
WITNESS: My name is Susan!
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: What gear were you in at the moment of the impact?
WITNESS: Gucci sweats and Reeboks.
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Are you sexually active?
WITNESS: No, I just lie there..
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: This myasthenia gravis, does it affect your memory at all?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And in what ways does it affect your memory?
WITNESS: I forget.
ATTORNEY: You forget? Can you give us an example of something you forgot?
___________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Do you know if your daughter has ever been involved in voodoo?
WITNESS: We both do.
ATTORNEY: Voodoo?
WITNESS: We do.
ATTORNEY: You do?
WITNESS: Yes, voodoo.
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Now doctor, isn't it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn't know about it until the next morning?
WITNESS: Did you actually pass the bar exam?
____________________________________
ATTORNEY: The youngest son, the twenty-year-old, how old is he?
WITNESS: He's twenty, much like your IQ.
___________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Were you present when your picture was taken?
WITNESS: Are you shitting me?
_________________________________________
ATTORNEY: So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And what were you doing at that time?
WITNESS: getting laid
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: She had three children, right?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: How many were boys?
WITNESS: None.
ATTORNEY: Were there any girls?
W ITNESS : Your Honor, I think I need a different attorney. Can I get a new attorney?
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: How was your first marriage terminated?
WITNESS: By death.
ATTORNEY: And by whose death was it terminated?
WITNESS: Take a guess.
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Can you describe the individual?
WITNESS: He was about medium height and had a beard.
ATTORNEY: Was this a male or a female?
WITNESS: Unless the Circus was in town I'm going with male.
_____________________________________
ATTORNEY: Is your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition notice which I sent to your attorney?
WITNESS: No, this is how I dress when I go to work.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Doctor, how many of your autopsies have you performed on dead people?
WITNESS: All of them. The live ones put up too much of a fight.
_________________________________________
ATTORNEY: ALL your responses MUST be oral, OK? What school did you go to?
WITNESS: Oral.
_________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Do you recall the time that you examined the body?
WITNESS: The autopsy started around 8:30 p.m.
ATTORNEY: And Mr. Denton was dead at the time?
WITNESS: If not, he was by the time I finished.
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Are you qualified to give a urine sample?
WITNESS: Are you qualified to ask that question?
______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for blood pressure?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for breathing?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: How can you be so sure, Doctor?
WITNESS: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
ATTORNEY: I see, but could the patient have still been alive, nevertheless?
WITNESS: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.
-----
ENJOY.
---BlaxMonkey from Kuantan------
-------------------------------
The following quotations are from a book called Disorder in the American Courts by Charles M. Sevilla and are things people actually said in court, word for word, taken down and published by court reporters that had the torment of staying calm while these exchanges were taking place. Regardless of originations, they can be eye openers as to the mentality of those engaged in the drill...
ATTORNEY: What was the first thing your husband said to you that morning?
WITNESS: He said, 'Where am I, Cathy?'
ATTORNEY: And why did that upset you?
WITNESS: My name is Susan!
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: What gear were you in at the moment of the impact?
WITNESS: Gucci sweats and Reeboks.
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Are you sexually active?
WITNESS: No, I just lie there..
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: This myasthenia gravis, does it affect your memory at all?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And in what ways does it affect your memory?
WITNESS: I forget.
ATTORNEY: You forget? Can you give us an example of something you forgot?
___________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Do you know if your daughter has ever been involved in voodoo?
WITNESS: We both do.
ATTORNEY: Voodoo?
WITNESS: We do.
ATTORNEY: You do?
WITNESS: Yes, voodoo.
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Now doctor, isn't it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn't know about it until the next morning?
WITNESS: Did you actually pass the bar exam?
____________________________________
ATTORNEY: The youngest son, the twenty-year-old, how old is he?
WITNESS: He's twenty, much like your IQ.
___________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Were you present when your picture was taken?
WITNESS: Are you shitting me?
_________________________________________
ATTORNEY: So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And what were you doing at that time?
WITNESS: getting laid
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: She had three children, right?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: How many were boys?
WITNESS: None.
ATTORNEY: Were there any girls?
W ITNESS : Your Honor, I think I need a different attorney. Can I get a new attorney?
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: How was your first marriage terminated?
WITNESS: By death.
ATTORNEY: And by whose death was it terminated?
WITNESS: Take a guess.
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Can you describe the individual?
WITNESS: He was about medium height and had a beard.
ATTORNEY: Was this a male or a female?
WITNESS: Unless the Circus was in town I'm going with male.
_____________________________________
ATTORNEY: Is your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition notice which I sent to your attorney?
WITNESS: No, this is how I dress when I go to work.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Doctor, how many of your autopsies have you performed on dead people?
WITNESS: All of them. The live ones put up too much of a fight.
_________________________________________
ATTORNEY: ALL your responses MUST be oral, OK? What school did you go to?
WITNESS: Oral.
_________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Do you recall the time that you examined the body?
WITNESS: The autopsy started around 8:30 p.m.
ATTORNEY: And Mr. Denton was dead at the time?
WITNESS: If not, he was by the time I finished.
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Are you qualified to give a urine sample?
WITNESS: Are you qualified to ask that question?
______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for blood pressure?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for breathing?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: How can you be so sure, Doctor?
WITNESS: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
ATTORNEY: I see, but could the patient have still been alive, nevertheless?
WITNESS: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.
-----
ENJOY.
---BlaxMonkey from Kuantan------
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)