Nizar tidak gentleman

DS Nizar di katakan tidak berniat baik bilamana dia telah ketahui hilang majoriti tapi cuba sedaya upaya untuk mendalangi krisis agar sentimen yang ada masa itu akan membawa kemenangan bagi DAP dan konco2 nya.
Hingga kan dia sanggup buat apa saja termasuk mohon menderhaka dan membawa kekemelutan dalam politik Perak.
Di barat kalau sebuah kerajaan itu telah hilang kepercayaan di Dewan, kerajaan tersebut dengan secara gentelman akan memberi kuasa balik kepada Governor atau presiden. Ini adalah tatacara sebuah sistem demokrasi berperlembagaan. Ini tidak kira samada ada berlakunya perloncatan. Sebab tiap2 wakil adalah bebas untuk bersekutu dgn mana2 pihak. Kita tidak terima hujah2 'back door government kerana ini adalah juga saranan amalan kerajaan DSAI satu masa dahulu. Tidak mestinya kalau Nasharudin boleh melompat ke PR, maka Dari PR ke Bebas tidak boleh.
Balik kepada DS Nizar. Nampaknya mungkin Nizar mempunyai 'mala fide' iaitu bad intention atau niat jahat dengan tidak meletakan jawatan atau dengan sengaja mengiyakan perletakan jawatan ke3 wakil PR itu walaupun dia tahu perletakan itu tidak sah.
Maka sekiranya in betul. Apa kah pemimpin begini PAS mahu ketengahkan? Pemimipin yang menggelapkan mata pengikutnya dengan kononnya dia lebih Islam dari yang lain.
Walhal dia lebih suka orang Islam berpecah belah.Dengan memutar belit kata2 raja dan memngaibkan raja sampai pengikut PAS yang berbangsa Melayu sanggup juga menghina Reja mereka sendiri. Bukan kah institusi Raja lah yang telah banyka membawa orang Melayu kepada Islam.
Apa jua keputusan Mahkamah hari ini kita terima tidak payah sesiapa pergi berbaring tengah jalan. Kalau nak buat tunjuk terror buatlah semasa SAMJAL (Samseng Jalanan) membuat aktiviti mereka. Baru lah namanya hero masyarakat.

Untuk tatapan perihal minority government sila layar:
http://www.answers.com/topic/minority-government.
Petikan ...1
------------
The Netherlands
Coalitions in the Netherlands are formed with the support from parliamentary parties, elected in a system of proportional representation. Although very rare, minority governments can be formed during the formation period of a Dutch cabinet, since an election might not result in a coalition that can be agreed upon by the parliamentary parties. More often, a minority government is formed when one of the parliamentary factions of a coalition partner of the cabinet retracts its support for the coalition, or when all ministers of that parliamentary party resign. Then the Prime Minister will offer the resignation of the full cabinet to the Dutch Monarch.

At this point, the Monarch may choose to dissolve Parliament and hold a general election, making the cabinet demissionair. A demissionair cabinet is not a minority government, but rather a form of caretaker government, enjoying only limited powers until the new Parliament assembles.

If the Monarch does not dissolve Parliament, the remaining Cabinet continues as a rompkabinet in full possession of its powers. A rompkabinet can finish any introduced legislation (e.g., a budget), but will need to obtain majority support in Parliament if this legislation is to be passed; this will necessarily mean gaining the support of parties outside the government. General elections may then be held at some later time. Theoretically, there is no need to hold an early general election, but early elections are often called in practice because the basis for the regeerakkoord is gone.

A third option available to the Monarch is the formation of a new cabinet, based on a different Parliamentary majority, which may even include the defecting coalition partner. Elections are then held as scheduled at the end of the parliamentary term, since the Monarch will not dissolve parliament when an informateur was able to negotiate a new regeerakkoord.

-----
ATAU http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hung_parliament

--PETIKAN 2
In parliamentary systems, a hung parliament is one in which no one political party has an outright majority, and means it is most commonly equally balanced. This situation is normal in many legislatures with proportional representation such as Germany or Italy, or in legislatures with strong regional parties; in such legislatures the term 'hung parliament' is rarely used. However in majoritarian chambers with weak regional parties, a hung parliament is a rarity, as in these circumstances one party will usually hold enough seats to form a majority.

A hung parliament will force either a coalition government, a minority government or a dissolution of parliament. Frequent hung parliaments can result in smaller parties staying in power for decades as they switch support between the two or three major parties (this is what happened with the Free Democratic Party in West Germany prior to reunification).

The most recent hung parliament after a general election in the United Kingdom was the February 1974 general election, which lasted until the October election that year. Prior to that the last had been the elections of 1951 and 1929. Hung parliaments can also arise when slim government majorities are eroded by by-election defeats and defection of Members of Parliament to opposition parties. This happened in 1996 to the Conservative government of Sir John Major (1990-97) and in 1978 to the Labour government of James Callaghan (1976-79).

An alternative term for a hung parliament, preferred by the Liberal Democrats in the UK, is a balanced parliament.[citation needed]

The current Parliament of Canada is a hung parliament; however, the term is not used in Canada. Instead, the term minority government or minority parliament is used.

Negotiation
A hung Parliament inevitably leads to a period of uncertainty after an election, especially in countries that are not used to it. In the 1974 UK General Election, sitting Prime Minister Edward Heath refused at first to resign, attempting to build a coalition government despite winning fewer seats (though gaining more votes) than the then opposition Labour Party.

Much speculation has gone into whether the Liberal Democrats in the UK would support a Labour government if no party won a majority in the General Election. In such a situation, they could hold the balance of power in that, as the centre party, they could choose to ally with either Labour or the Conservatives to form the next government, or decide to support specific measures of a minority government without entering a formal coalition.

In the Western Australian state election of 2008 the Australian Labor Party won more seats than the Liberal Party at 28 to 24 (although the Liberal Party gained more votes). The National Party along with three independents had the seats needed to give either party a majority. To help the Liberal Party form government the Nationals threw their support behind the party on the condition that the Royalties for Regions policy was implemented.


[edit] Working majority
Sometimes although a parliament or assembly may be technically hung, the party in power can have a working majority. Such was the case in the National Assembly for Wales, where Labour lost their majority when Peter Law was expelled for standing against the official candidate in the 2005 Westminster election in the Blaenau Gwent constituency. When the Assembly was first elected on 1 May 2003, Labour won 30 seats, Plaid Cymru won 12, the Conservatives won 11, Lib Dems won 6, and the John Marek Independent Party won a seat. When Dafydd Elis-Thomas (Plaid) was reelected as the presiding officer, this reduced the number of opposition AMs who could vote to 29, as the presiding officer only votes in the event of a tie, and even then not on party political lines. Labour, thus, had a working majority of one seat. This was lost when Law ran in Blaenau Gwent.[1]